Or Why can’t they just disappear of to Vegas and get married by an Elvis impersonator?
I’m sure that the Daily Mail would give me thirty thousand reasons as to why this is not a good idea, but I can’t think of one.
For the next six to nine months this is what we are in for people so brace yourselves:
- We will really need to know that they are 23rd cousins twice removed, because some past royal had a one night stand with Kate Middleton’s 6xgreat grand-mother. I haven’t actually seen this as yet, but believe me every newspaper, with the possible exceptions of the Guardian and the Independent, is doing the research.
- We will need to see endless photos of Kate Middleton in various stages of undress taken in an earlier more carefree life.
- Likewise we will need to hear the remembrances of someone who was her third best friend in nursery class?
- We need an avalanche of Kate’n’Wills© tat – it is probably the only boost the economy is going to get this year
I think it is mainly the prurience that I am objecting to, but it may be my republican sympathies coming out.
I don’t have a problem with two people who are in love getting married, but outside of family and friends should anyone really be concerned about a wedding? Unless of course you make the argument, which I reject completely, that we, as citizens of the United Kingdom, are, in some magical way, the children of Elizabeth Windsor.
Something else occurs to me, mainly about the timing of this. Our ConDem government is going to be attracting a lot of negative attention in the coming months as tax increases and spending cuts start to bite. I am not a conspiracy theorist, but might just make an exception in this case. This is going to soak up front page headlines for the next six to nine months, and probably a fair while after that. A good year to bury bad news?